Foretravel Owners' Forum

Foretravel Motorhome Forums => Foretravel Tech Talk => Topic started by: BamaFan on December 04, 2014, 09:11:55 pm

Title: Coach speed vs. RPM
Post by: BamaFan on December 04, 2014, 09:11:55 pm
In order to keep my engine RPM above 1500 at a reasonably safe speed, I can never use 6th gear. In 6th gear above 1500 RPM I would be at 80 MPH or faster and I am not comfortable driving that fast. Anyone else have this problem?
Title: Re: Coach speed vs. RPM
Post by: Tim Fiedler on December 04, 2014, 09:18:11 pm
Hmmm. 1500 in mine is right at 65

2000 u-320 4010
Title: Re: Coach speed vs. RPM
Post by: D.J. Osborn on December 04, 2014, 09:25:54 pm
I am just over 1500 RPM at 70 MPH in 6th.
Title: Re: Coach speed vs. RPM
Post by: BamaFan on December 04, 2014, 09:30:54 pm
I don't like to let the RPM drop below about 1700 because it feels like it's lugging in 5th at that RPM.
Title: Re: Coach speed vs. RPM
Post by: wolfe10 on December 04, 2014, 09:41:43 pm
Royce,

Wonder if your tach is accurate? 

Could have it verified.

Could use this formula to verify: (Engine RPM x 60) / (Rear Axle Ratio x Tire Revolutions per Mile x Transmission Ratio) = MPH
Title: Re: Coach speed vs. RPM
Post by: Steve & Ginny Hill on December 04, 2014, 10:30:50 pm
96 U295. C8.3 Cummins. Allison 3000 series. 1800 rpm=62 mph 6th gear
Title: Re: Coach speed vs. RPM
Post by: Caflashbob on December 04, 2014, 10:33:50 pm
In order to keep my engine RPM above 1500 at a reasonably safe speed, I can never use 6th gear. In 6th gear above 1500 RPM I would be at 80 MPH or faster and I am not comfortable driving that fast. Anyone else have this problem?

Tach or speedo seems off
Title: Re: Coach speed vs. RPM
Post by: jcus on December 04, 2014, 10:46:52 pm
1700 rpm seems a little high, max torque is at 1200 rpm, believe cummins recommends 1500 rpm for best all round performance.
At 1500, I am going 70.5 mph by silverleaf and gps.
Title: Re: Coach speed vs. RPM
Post by: Michael & Jackie on December 04, 2014, 11:52:29 pm
Royce, we same set up.  We right at 1375 rpm at 65 mph.  No need to be 1500 rpm, IMHO. My reading on rpm not by digital though so tach a little hard to read very closely but the 1375 seems it.
Title: Re: Coach speed vs. RPM
Post by: Mark D on December 04, 2014, 11:55:57 pm
I remember seeing a chart somewhere indicating optimal fuel economy is at 1400 on the ISM so that is where I keep it.  Either 55mph in 5th or 63-64mph in 6th.
Title: Re: Coach speed vs. RPM
Post by: Barry Beam on December 05, 2014, 01:08:35 am
1700 rpm seems a little high, max torque is at 1200 rpm, believe cummins recommends 1500 rpm for best all round performance.
At 1500, I am going 70.5 mph by silverleaf and gps.
That is closer to what I found. To keep 1500 rpm I have to be over 71 mph.
Title: Re: Coach speed vs. RPM
Post by: Pierce & Gaylie Stewart on December 05, 2014, 11:28:28 am
Different coaches will have different rear end ratios so different speeds for a given RPM. To verify tachometer, use Silverleaf or Pro-Link 9000 and it will give you a digital readout to compare to the analog tach reading.

The Allison should sense a "lugging" condition and shift down to keep RPM within specs for the load.

Pierce
Title: Re: Coach speed vs. RPM
Post by: krush on December 05, 2014, 12:36:26 pm
Cummins will have a spec that says "above XX RPM full throttle operation allowed". Now, this was mostly for mechanical engines. The computer will prevent overloading (aka "lugging") of the M11.

For flat land driving, I'd aim for around 1300-1400rpm at cruise of 70-75mph. Just kick it down to 5th for the hills.

I'm re-gearing my c8.3. Going to go from 5.13 to 4.33. There's a thread I made about it.
Title: Re: Coach speed vs. RPM
Post by: BamaFan on December 05, 2014, 05:22:50 pm
Pierce said:
Quote
The Allison should sense a "lugging" condition and shift down to keep RPM within specs for the load.

So from what I am reading here is 1500 is not too low an RPM for a ISM450. Correct?
Title: Re: Coach speed vs. RPM
Post by: Tim Fiedler on December 05, 2014, 06:30:43 pm
I think it is peak torque for that engine, the effiecency sweet spot
Title: Re: Coach speed vs. RPM
Post by: jcus on December 05, 2014, 06:47:56 pm
1500 rpm, best combination of power and efficiency.
Title: Re: Coach speed vs. RPM
Post by: Mark D on December 06, 2014, 12:49:56 pm
I went to find the chart that I found before regarding ISM fuel consumption vs rpm and all I can find the is the one for the C83 which does indicate 1500 is the sweet spot.  I could swear what I found before was that 1400 was the sweet spot for the ISM.  Either way I don't think it has nearly the effect that cruise speed does (55mph vs 65mph).
Title: Re: Coach speed vs. RPM
Post by: Tim Fiedler on December 06, 2014, 01:52:28 pm
Sweet spot is always max torque rpm per cummins RV mileage publication, as far as engine efficiency goes. Mind you that may not be a speed/top gear sweet spot depending on gearing
Title: Re: Coach speed vs. RPM
Post by: krush on December 06, 2014, 08:39:17 pm
  Either way I don't think it has nearly the effect that cruise speed does (55mph vs 65mph).

Agree. Going from 55mph to 65mph requires more HP. Making more HP requires burning more fuel!

What a engine fuel efficiency curve shows is how efficient the engine is at making each of those HP. Brake Specific Fuel Consumption (BSFC).

So, your engine may consume more fuel if it is putting out more HP, but actually operating more efficiently.