Re: Prestone Extended Life Coolant
Reply #31 –
Another related question. I understand that when switching to extended life coolant, the system is not considered extended life until a second replacement of the coolant. If this is true, then what is the typical procedure?
a. Perform the first change to extended life coolant, run system for a short while, say a month, then flush the second time, or,
b. Perform the first change to extended life coolant, run system for 2 years, then flush the second time.
I say in b. above as regular coolant is good for 2 years anyway, so why waste 2 years' use of coolant?
Anyone have input, or is there some secret coolant manufacturer marketing code I don't understand?
In the engine coolant business extended life as a term has certainly been perverted by some company's marketing people. With the advent of the first OAT coolant, Texaco Extended Life Coolant with Nitrite, their marketing talk was that you needed their specific technology to achieve long life from the coolant. Some bought that story. Others questioned that as there was ample evidence in the HD trucking business that conventional coolants were never changed through out the life of the truck.
What is it that gives coolant a specific lifespan? The real story on coolant life has to do with changes that happen to coolant that cause it to be unsuitable for continued use. No company's inhibitor technology can over come the following: oil in the coolant, pH degrading over time, coolants with ammonia odor, coolants that have a strong non-coolant odor. All of these can be attributed to operational issues in the engine. An engine has an oil cooler failure releasing small amounts of lubricating oil into the coolant. While there may not be much showing in the surge tank or radiator top tank, small amounts of coolant adversely affect the performance of the SCA to protect the liners and parent bore cylinder walls (non-liner engine) against cavitation pitting process. Oil coats the surface and the SCA cannot continue to protect. The coolant can be new but still be over as to useful life because of this issue. Coolants naturally degrade with time and mostly heat to lower and lower pH levels. Eventually you get to the change threshold. No SCA or OAT inhibitor can stop it but can prolong the inevitable. Conventional coolants (non-OAT) are much better at prolonging this problem than OAT. It is a long story in chemistry why that is so.
The real story on OAT coolants like the original Texaco ELC, CAT ELC, Shell Rotella ELC (all generation 1 OAT) and the latest OAT technology (nitrite-free) is that they are extended service interval coolants. There are several conventional coolants that fall into the category of extended service. They too suffer the same "life limiting" issues as OAT. When the OAT coolants call for an extender to be added at some point or a conventional coolant calls for additions of SCA at oil change intervals they are both talking about maintenance of the chemistry, not longer operating life of the coolant.