Skip to main content
Topic: East/West vs North/South (Read 525 times) previous topic - next topic

East/West vs North/South

We're beginning research for our new coach and of course I have lots of questions.  I'm pretty certain we like the 2001 -2004 U320 series of coaches, 38, 40, or 42.  We're leaning towards the larger coaches simply for more basement storage.  My question is this: 
1) What are advantages/disadvantages of the east/west vs north/south beds?  It seems the later designs seemed to use the east/west layout more often?
2) I also read some comments on this forum about a king sized bed in the east/west layout?  Is this possible?
3) Does either layout favor engine access or serviceability?

Thanks

Sam

Re: East/West vs North/South

Reply #1
I have had both and like the east west better. It slept better and there was no closet pressed into the side of the bed if you had to sleep with the slide in.
2025 Wanderbox Outpost 32 on F600 Expedition Motorhome
2015 Born Free Royal Splendor on Ford 550 nonslide version  for sale
Former Coaches  covering. 360,000 miles
1999 34 U270
2000 36 U320
2001 42' double slide U320
2018 Jeep Rubicon

Re: East/West vs North/South

Reply #2
I like the north/west bed for easy access to the eng.
Richard & Betty Bark & Keiko our Golden Doodle
2003 U320T 3820 PBDS
Build # 6215
MC # 16926
2016 Chevrolet Colorado 4X4 diesel

Re: East/West vs North/South

Reply #3
In my 42 foot I had the same access as the back was a closet that had the floor lift up on a hing.  It was the same size as the bed access.
2025 Wanderbox Outpost 32 on F600 Expedition Motorhome
2015 Born Free Royal Splendor on Ford 550 nonslide version  for sale
Former Coaches  covering. 360,000 miles
1999 34 U270
2000 36 U320
2001 42' double slide U320
2018 Jeep Rubicon

 

Re: East/West vs North/South

Reply #4
We have had both.  Our current 42' 2003 coach has the east west configuration and it seems more livable.  The closet all across the back in the 42' is wonderful.  Also the bed isn't getting all the engine heat quite like the NS configuration does when you pull over and want to sleep right away.  We don't do that as much as we did when we were younger and driving at night more.  That said, the engine access seems much better with the bed lifting up on the NS.  That hasn't been a problem for this one however.
Rick & Rhonda
2003 U320 4220  Build #6199
Was
91 36' GV 300 Caterpillar, 92 40' U280 300 Cummins, 97 36' U295 300 Cummins, 2002
U320 450 Cummins
(Guess we're hooked)

The selected media item is not currently available.