Re: B20 in a mid-90's engine (split from Re: Motor losing power)
Reply #12 –
The high pressure common rail engines internal components were designed for the corrosive nature of the
ULSD.
After replacing all my non ULSD rated fuel lines and probably the fuel filter I feel that I should try to avoid the b20 that cummins says my engine is not designed for.
I feel my m11 is less torquey than it could be. If I dyno it again and it's still low I may invest in a set of injectors.
Need to research this more. My old Foretravel salesman said our 97 u320 "did not know what a hill was" to quote him. This one does
While ours runs well I never drove them new so a comparison is impossible.
Everything else cost power and mpg so far (air filter, fuel filter, cam sensor, hydraulic fan controller, needing the rack run, set the valves, etc) why not that the ULSD and b20 has reduced the power already.
Lower power from b20'also I understand.
Need to research this. Someone knows.....
Maybe the same rubber parts in the fuel system as the fuel lines.
Otherwise why would cummins specifically not list the m11 on the b20 approved list..