Re: Air bags verses level jacks Reply #25 – May 19, 2016, 08:47:09 pm The structural loads from leveling jacks can damage the coach. Twist it enough and they can become noisy for a while. Quote Selected
Re: Air bags verses level jacks Reply #26 – May 19, 2016, 08:57:05 pm Quote from: Caflashbob – May 19, 2016, 08:47:09 pmThe structural loads from leveling jacks can damage the coach. Twist it enough and they can become noisy for a while.I always used two jacks at a time both front or both on one side. 18 years use no problem. Maybe the Hendrickson frames are stronger. Quote Selected
Re: Air bags verses level jacks Reply #27 – May 19, 2016, 10:54:49 pm Quote from: craneman – May 19, 2016, 08:57:05 pmI always used two jacks at a time both front or both on one side. 18 years use no problem. Maybe the Hendrickson frames are stronger.Roto bilateral is the term.Sometimes in a hurry I would manually level auto level coaches with a single jack at a time Quote Selected
Re: Air bags verses level jacks Reply #28 – May 19, 2016, 11:43:55 pm I believe HWH level jacks such as the ones that was on my former u225 when used properly are very good. I would not dismiss a FT U225 just because it does not have air level. Having owned both, yes air ride/level is great but there was nothing wrong the way the U225 was setup. Quote Selected
Re: Air bags verses level jacks Reply #29 – May 20, 2016, 02:19:53 pm Have Big Foot jacks on my Lazy Daze, air on the FT, really like them both, and would love to have them both on a coach. Had HWH kick down jacks on a coach and wasn't impressed. Quote Selected
Topic: Air bags verses level jacks