NADA Values vs. Real World
So this topic is very interesting to me. This was briefly discussed in the "Winnebago" post and has been bantered around before. I'm curious if most of you subscribe to the NADA retail value when selling and purchasing a coach? I did a quick spread sheet compilation of just the FT's listed in our own classifieds over the last 6 months. Now this doesn't cover some of the special items folks have added to their coaches or make exceptions for those coaches that have been maintained better than others (i.e. - Brett Wolfe's U240). I just listed asking vs. NADA retail value (this can also change with what options if any you select, I selected none).
I understand where NADA is supposed to get their data from, but that doesn't mean its being done that way. There are many variables that could be happening here such as a very small sample size, repos that are in horrible condition, FT's lumped in with SOBs, etc. Anyway, from what's listed on here, most of you tend to believe an FT is worth much more than blue book value (or at least asking price is much more). That's also reflected in what I see outside of our Forum on Craigslist, EBAY, RV Oodle searches, RV Trader, and sites like MOT or FOT. In my experience, asking isn't usually 20% - 50% more than blue book value, but maybe that's different on RVs? Looking for comments, thoughts, etc. Ultimately, the value of a coach is what someone is willing to pay for it, but this data shows EVERYONE is way off (except the 2000 GV320, that's a steal!).