Re: Opinions on short 34' pusher
Reply #11 –
We were fixated on a 34 because anything larger, coming from a 27 foot class C seemed intimidating. We ended up with a 34' U270 with some upgrade and premium options which we absolutely love. It fits the bill for us as full-timers and is an all around great rig. The U270 lacks the Aqua-hot and some other "whistles and bells found on the U295 and U320, but in my mind there is a argument to be made for less of that as more complexity brings higher cost of repairs and more maintenance.
That said, I wish we had been open to a 36 foot and not ruled it out because of our fixation on finding the smallest FT available. Interior storage on the 34 is more than adequate, However, once I got to see some 36 footers post-purchase, I was amazed at how much more basement storage that those extra couple feet provides, while hardly being able to discern a difference in size between our rig and a 36. Basement storage in the 34 is cramped with the the compressor, HWH boxes, hydraulic pump, etc. If we had to do it again, we'd probably go with the 36. The fact that its not as rare probably would have given us some more room for negotiation when settling on a purchase price.
I would look at and drive both before you completely rule out the 36 foot.